What condition applies to an investigator who uses a status previously held for personal benefit?

The condition that applies to an investigator who uses a status previously held for personal benefit is centered around the ethical obligation to avoid conflicts of interest. When an investigator uses information or a position of trust for personal gain, it creates a potential conflict that can undermine the integrity of their role. By requiring that they cannot represent another person in a related matter without consent, it ensures transparency and maintains trust in the investigative profession.

This principle is rooted in the idea that any information or influence gained from the previous status could bias the investigator's actions in a new case, thereby compromising their objectivity. Thus, obtaining consent before representing another client is essential to uphold ethical standards and protect the interests of all parties involved.

Other options do not adequately address the ethical implications and responsibilities that arise from potential conflicts of interest. Notifying a previous client each time may not be comprehensive enough to cover the range of issues caused by the conflict. Continuing practice as usual undermines the necessity to maintain ethical boundaries, while switching professions entirely may be an extreme response to what could be handled through appropriate consent protocols. Hence, ensuring that consent is obtained is the most academically and ethically sound approach.