Under Louisiana Revised Statutes, which of the following statements about intercepted communications is true?

The statement regarding intercepted communications being inadmissible if obtained illegally aligns with legal principles established under Louisiana Revised Statutes. This reflects the broader context of privacy rights and the legal protections surrounding communication interception. According to both state and federal laws, including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, evidence gathered through illegal interception violates individuals' rights and is typically deemed inadmissible in court.

This principle emphasizes the need for law enforcement and other parties to adhere strictly to legal protocols when intercepting communications. If the interception does not meet the established legal criteria—such as obtaining necessary warrants or consent—then the resulting evidence cannot be used in legal proceedings. This ensures that the integrity of the judicial process is maintained and protects citizens from unlawful surveillance.

Other statements do not correctly represent the legal framework surrounding intercepted communications. For instance, leaked or disclosed evidence by law enforcement does not automatically make it admissible, particularly if it was obtained illegally. Similarly, intercepted communications may not always be applicable in civil cases, and suggesting that all intercepted communications are always admissible in trials oversimplifies the complexities involved in determining evidence legality.