Is it true that any person is entitled to their own prior statements, regardless of who took the statement?

The assertion that any person is entitled to their own prior statements is indeed accurate. This principle stems from the concept of personal rights concerning one's own statements, which suggests that individuals have the right to access and review any statements they've made, irrespective of who recorded or took them. This right is integral to maintaining transparency and accountability, especially in legal contexts where statements may play a critical role in investigations or court proceedings.

Accessing one's own statements enables individuals to understand what they have previously communicated, which can be crucial for verifying facts, consistency in testimony, and ensuring that their viewpoint is accurately represented. It also aligns with fairness principles in legal processes, where individuals should have the opportunity to confront and respond to their past declarations.

In contrast, the other options limit this right in various ways, such as restricting access to only certain parties involved or expert witnesses, which would undermine the fundamental right one has to their own statements. This principle is a vital component of legal and investigative practices, ensuring that individuals can engage meaningfully in any proceedings that concern their own declarations.