According to the Larocca Rule, how many private investigators should ideally be present during surveillance for proof of adultery?

The Larocca Rule suggests that for effective and credible surveillance, particularly in cases proving adultery, it is recommended to have two private investigators involved. This approach maximizes the chances of successfully capturing evidence while minimizing the risks of being detected or having the evidence challenged in court.

Having two investigators allows for various advantages, such as one investigator focusing on the subjects being surveilled while the other handles necessary documentation and reporting, thereby ensuring that multiple angles are covered. This can be crucial for verifying the activities observed and providing corroborative evidence, which is often necessary in legal situations surrounding adultery claims. Additionally, the presence of two investigators can help provide an alibi or counter any claims of bias or improper conduct since they can corroborate each other's findings.

In contrast, having only one investigator could limit the effectiveness of the surveillance due to the potential for distraction and difficulty in managing all aspects of the evidence gathering alone. More than two investigators might be excessive and could draw unnecessary attention or increase the likelihood of being detected, which could jeopardize the operation's success. Therefore, the optimal number is two, as indicated by the Larocca Rule, to ensure thorough and reliable evidence collection.